Federalist 28: A Federal Standing Army Can Quell Insurrections
The Use of Force May Be Required to Quell Civil Disturbances
SEDITIONS AND INSURRECTIONS are maladies that are as inseparable from the body politic as tumors and eruptions are from the natural body. Thus, the idea of governing at all times with the simple force of law exists only in the reveries of those political doctors whose sagacity disdains the admonitions of experimental instruction. Emergencies of this kind arise at times in all societies, no matter how they are constituted. Our own experience corroborates the lessons taught by the examples of other nations. Should such an emergency arise under the Constitution, the only response must be by force, since an insurrection – whatever its immediate cause – eventually endangers all forms of government.
State Militias are Adequate to Control Minor Disturbances
The means employed to respond to such an event must be proportional to the mischief. if it is but a slight commotion in a small part of a State, the militia of the other States would be adequate suppress it. The Federal government should presume that the State militias would be ready to do their duty, if only to preserve the public peace. As for upholding the rights of the Federal government, it would be irrational to assume State militias would not assist – so long as the people find the practices of that government conducive to their prosperity and felicity.
Larger Disturbances Require a Force Greater than State Militias
If an insurrection should pervade a whole or principal part of a State, it might be unavoidable to employ a different kind of force. Massachusetts found it necessary to raise troops for repressing the disorders within its borders. Pennsylvania also thought it was proper to have recourse to the same remedy from the mere apprehension of commotions among a part of her citizens. If the State of New York had been inclined to reestablish her lost jurisdiction over the inhabitants of Vermont, could she have hoped for success from the efforts of her militia alone? Would she not have been compelled to raise and to maintain a more regular force for the execution of her design?
* * *
In the event the representatives of the People betray their constituents, the only resource left is the exercise of the right of self-defense, a right paramount to all positive forms of government. The right of self-defense against the usurpations of the Federal government can be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against an individual State government.
* * *
The recurring need to utilize a force greater than the militias in extraordinary cases within the States – as shown by these examples – negates the objection that the Federal government ought not to have the same power under a like necessity in similar extremities. Is there anyone who would prefer not to have that option to respond to the unceasing agitations and frequent revolutions which are the continual scourges of petty republics?
Dividing the United States into Three, Four or Thirteen Separate Parts Is No Solution
Those who object to a standing army for the Federal government presumably would also object to the existence of a standing army for three or four confederacies of States. Would not each of them be exposed to the same insurrections as a Federal government? Would not each confederacy have recourse to the same expedients for upholding its authority which are objected to in a Federal government for all the States? Would a militia be more ready or more able to support the Federal authority than in the case of the general union under the Constitution? The principle of the objection applies equally in both cases. Whether we have one government for all of the States, or different governments for different parcels of them – or even if there should be an entire separation of the States – it might become necessary to use a force constituted differently from the militias, in order to preserve the peace of the community and maintain the just authority of the laws against those violent invasions of them which amount to insurrections and rebellions.
To those who would require a more definite prohibition against military establishments in times of peace, it is a full answer to say that the whole power of the Federal government is to be in the hands of the representatives of the People. This is the essential and only efficacious security for the rights and privileges of the People attainable in a civil society.
* * *
It can be said without exaggeration that in a republican confederacy of State governments like ours, the People are entirely the masters of their own fate. Power is almost always the rival of power. Just as the Federal government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of State governments, the State governments will have the same disposition towards the Federal government. By throwing themselves onto either scale, the People will infallibly tip those scales in their favor. If their rights are invaded by either the Federal or State governments, the People can make use of the other as the instrument of redress.
* * *
The Innate Right of Self-Defense Is Available to Counter a Federal Usurpation
In the event the representatives of the People betray their constituents, the only resource left is the exercise of the right of self-defense, a right paramount to all positive forms of government. The right of self-defense against the usurpations of the Federal government can be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against an individual State government. If the persons entrusted with control of a State government become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, and districts of the State – having no distinct government in each – can take no regular measure for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, system, or resource, except in their courage and despair. The usurpers – clothed with the forms of legal authority – can too often crush the opposition in embryo. In smaller States, it will be more difficult for the People to form a regular or systematic plan of opposition. Hence it will be easier to defeat their initial efforts. It will be easier to obtain speedy intelligence of their preparations and movements. Hence the military force in the possession of the usurpers can be more rapidly directed against the part where the opposition has begun. In this situation there must be a peculiar coincidence of circumstances to insure success to the popular resistance.
The obstacles to usurpation – and the facilities of resistance – increase with the physical extent of a State, provided the individual citizens understand their rights and are disposed to defend them. The natural strength of the People – compared to the artificial strength of a government – is greater in a large community than in a small, and of course more competent to a struggle with the attempts of any government to establish a tyranny.
The People Can Tip the Balance against State or Federal Usurpations of Power
It can be said without exaggeration that in a republican confederacy of State governments like ours, the People are entirely the masters of their own fate. Power is almost always the rival of power. Just as the Federal government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of State governments, the State governments will have the same disposition towards the Federal government. By throwing themselves onto either scale, the People will infallibly tip those scales in their favor. If their rights are invaded by either the Federal or State governments, the People can make use of the other as the instrument of redress.
By supporting the creation of the United States, the People have wisely preserved to themselves an advantage which can never be too highly prized! It may safely be received as an axiom in our political system, that the State governments will, in all possible contingencies, afford complete security against invasions of the People’s liberty. The projects of usurpation by the Federal government cannot be masked under pretenses that would likely to escape notice by the select bodies of individuals in the State governments, nor by the People at large. The State legislatures will have access to more information regarding Federal plots to usurp power. They can discover the danger at a distance. Since State governments possess all the organs of civil power – as well as the confidence of the People – they can at once adopt a regular plan of opposition to the Federal government by combining all the resources of the community. They also can readily communicate with each other in the different States, and thereby unite their common forces for the protection of their common liberty.
The great extent of the country is a further security. We have already experienced its utility against the attacks of a foreign power. And it would have precisely the same effect against the enterprises of ambitious rulers in the Federal government. If the army of the Federal government should be able to quell the resistance of one State, it would be within the power of distant States to make head with fresh forces. The Federal government would have to abandon the advantages obtained in one State to subdue the opposition in other States. And upon the moment the State reduced to submission was left to itself, its efforts would be renewed, and its resistance revive.
In all events, the extent of a Federal military force is naturally limited by the resources of the States. It will not be possible to create a large Federal army for many years, but as our means increase, so too will our means of increasing the Federal army. Of course, this increase in means can grow only in proportion to the increase of the population and natural strength of the People and their communities.
Will the time ever arrive when the Federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the People of an immense empire? Not so long as the People – through the medium of their State governments – take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations. Those who fail to apprehend these facts may be viewed as suffering from a disease, for no cure can be found in the resources of argument and reasoning.
Hamiltonoriginal Federalist 28